{
  "paper_id": "ATT-0100",
  "paper_type": "分解式轻量时序预测与训练策略",
  "reading_recommendation": "值得读双流结构和三种评测协议；不要采信常数时间证明或平稳性因果解释。",
  "detailed_review_zh": "## 总体判断与旧评复核\nxPatch将指数移动平均分解、CNN与无激活MLP双流、按预测距离加权的MAE以及双Sigmoid学习率组合起来。它的优势是可分拆复用、多个领域效果较强，并且当前版本补充了不丢弃尾批次的TFB比较。方法是已有组件的有针对性整合，而不是新的时间序列分解理论。先读的旧摘要提到基线来源和平稳性解释问题，本次全文核验后必须更新判断：附录K明确区分引自论文、官方仓库与重跑的结果，且明确报告三个随机种子平均，因此不能再说论文完全没有来源说明或没有重复实验。只是方差和逐格来源仍缺失。旧评全文没有提供，旧分数不参与本次评分；旧摘要转述的仓库README也未作为当前版本事实。\n\n## 方法与真实增量\nEMA使越近的点权重越高，避免简单移动平均两端补值造成的部分失真，双流让季节残差进入带激活的卷积网络、趋势进入较简单的MLP。将patch当作卷积通道，再以depthwise和pointwise操作混合，是一种清楚、成本可控的结构选择。它对通道独立任务较自然，但没有建模真实变量间的关系，也不能由“spatio-temporal”措辞推断已有空间交互。最终拼接后线性层是固定学习权重，不能直接解释为输入条件的动态门控。\n\n季节项必然平稳且非线性、趋势项必然非平稳且线性，不是一般成立的对应关系。周期信号可以有随时间变化的均值，趋势也可以高度非线性。附录C把窗口ADF的p值求平均，平均数本身不是经过校准的整体检验；不能拒绝单位根零假设也不等于证明非平稳。尤其把EMA趋势更难拒绝单位根当作α=0.3“最优”的证据，不能替代独立预测验证。原文所谓线性分支含LayerNorm，严格说对输入并非线性映射；这不妨碍其作为少激活的低复杂度分支，却削弱“精确分离线性与非线性”的机制叙述。\n\n## 正确性问题的范围\n附录D将EMA递推展开为长度t+1的向量内积，随即宣称把O(n)时间改进为O(1)。展开等式可以成立，但内积仍需随输入长度增长的读入、乘加或归约工作，不能因为写成单个向量操作就视作常数时间。逐点在线EMA本来可O(1)更新，整段结果仍至少O(n)输出；若讨论GPU并行深度，则应给硬件与并行算法条件。当前“整段分解常数时间”的结论不能成立，我暂停这一特定复杂度主张，不因此否定实测速度或预测结果。\n\n式(8)还有一个局部规格缺口：depthwise结果标为N×P，直接加上N×P²输入，维度不相容。图3和文字说明存在linear residual，因此很可能遗漏了投影而非实际程序不能运行；正确做法是补齐投影的形状和参数。损失公式也把通道索引与未来步索引复用，并把整段向量范数放进逐步权重求和，需用逐预测点误差重写。这些是可以修复的报告问题，不能擅自假定代码与排印完全相同。\n\n## 基线、公平性与性能边界\n主表分别给统一输入长度与搜索输入长度的结果，附录再提供TFB不使用drop-last的第三协议，说明作者确实注意到评测流程影响结论。统一设置下xPatch在ETT、Weather与ILI等表现好，但Traffic平均MSE0.499明显差于iTransformer0.428，Electricity的0.179也落后CARD0.168，Exchange的0.375差于MICN0.315。搜索协议中Traffic的0.392仍不及iTransformer0.378，Exchange的0.366远高于DLinear0.297。它更稳定的优势在MAE，而非所有数据与损失上的共同领先。\n\n表15尤其值得单独读：不丢尾批次时，xPatch在Weather、Traffic、Electricity等仍有竞争力，但ETTh1、ETTm1的MSE由PDF更优，ETTh2由FITS更优，Exchange仍落后多个轻量方法；ILI误差较表14有明显变化。不同协议的变化不能只归因于某一个训练细节，因为基线来源和最终配置也变化了。较严谨的结论是该结构在广泛条件下有效，绝非完全消除了协议敏感性。附录K的来源说明改善了透明度，但统一名义配置不保证实际归一化、早停、测试尾批次和调参预算完全一致；还需逐行给数据版本、验证选择规则和运行配置。\n\n## 消融与不确定性\nEMA替换、四种双流分配、损失权重、学习率、输入长度、RevIN等消融相当丰富，超过单纯删除一个模块的证据。图6支持原双流搭配在三个数据集较好；表7显示EMA能迁移到其他模型，但并非所有行都改进。arctan作用于未来步的权重，不是对残差施加反正切，所以其稳健性主要来自MAE。表9与原MSE训练相比无法完全分开“改MAE”与“选arctan”的贡献，需补不加权MAE，以及相同损失下其他衰减函数。它对MAE的平均改进也伴随若干MSE恶化，不能写成所有精度都提高。\n\n三个种子平均是正面证据，但全文没有逐条件标准差、置信区间或配对检验。学习率消融的约百分之一改善和很多千分级差距因此不够证明稳定优越。双Sigmoid曲线与基线的累计学习率、训练末端值不同，其收益可能来自有效优化预算，而不只是曲线形状。可视化只给选中样本，能说明双流输出形状，不能估计失败比例或解释性的一致性。\n\n## 成本、复现与建议\n表3训练/推理时间显示xPatch约3.099/1.303毫秒，相对PatchTST和CARD有实际吸引力，但DLinear约0.420/0.310毫秒更轻，双流又比任一单流贵。还缺参数量、峰值内存和跨输入长度的完整成本曲线，不能把一张均值表等同全部部署收益。代码入口、结构图、数据切分和多组超参数提供了复现起点，本次未核验具体提交或运行代码，不承诺开箱复现。\n\n建议保留EMA+双流作为可实施基线，复现优先用表15协议，同时记录所有模型的输入搜索预算、完整测试样本数、三个以上种子的配对结果。理论平稳性、线性/非线性分工与常数复杂度应降为待修订论述。本文启发是低成本结构配合训练目标能达到很强表现，而不是已经证明一种普遍时间序列生成机制。个人相关性四维因缺用户背景维持未知。",
  "reading_record": {
    "legacy": "先读历史摘要；旧全文缺失；重新核验后确认本版附录说明混合基线来源和三种子平均，不沿用旧摘要的缺种子说法",
    "full_text": "PDF1–25逐页阅读，含参考文献、附录A–L及全部结果与可视化",
    "visual_checks": "p3–5架构、式8；p11复杂度与ADF；p13–16消融；p21–25所有预测图",
    "code_executed": false,
    "data_versions": "2412.17323v3，未核验外部仓库提交或数据文件哈希"
  },
  "claims": [
    {
      "claim_id": "CL01",
      "claim": "分解双流提供广泛预测精度与成本折中",
      "claim_type": "经验性能",
      "conditions": "所列统一、搜索及TFB协议",
      "support_status": "有较强条件性支持，非所有数据或MSE最优",
      "location": "表1–3、13–15"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "CL02",
      "claim": "向量化EMA把整段分解复杂度从O(n)降为O(1)",
      "claim_type": "复杂度",
      "conditions": "标准随输入长度计费的计算模型",
      "support_status": "暂停；内积与输出成本被省略",
      "location": "附录D式24–28"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "CL03",
      "claim": "EMA严格分离平稳非线性季节与非平稳线性趋势",
      "claim_type": "机制解释",
      "conditions": "需有效统计检验与独立生成机制验证",
      "support_status": "未证明，仅部分性能和ADF诊断",
      "location": "3.2、附录C/F"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "CL04",
      "claim": "arctan加权和Sigmoid学习率可迁移提升",
      "claim_type": "经验归因",
      "conditions": "采用文中训练预算和目标",
      "support_status": "多模型结果有支持，但缺不加权MAE与等优化预算对照",
      "location": "表9–11"
    }
  ],
  "risks": [
    {
      "risk_id": "R01",
      "severity": "重要问题",
      "certainty": "原文与运算量分析已确认，仅限复杂度结论",
      "description": "用单次向量内积记号推导常数时间不成立",
      "location": "p11附录D式28后",
      "question": "是否改报每点在线复杂度、总运算量和实测并行性能？"
    },
    {
      "risk_id": "R02",
      "severity": "重要问题",
      "certainty": "公式规格缺口确定，代码实现未知",
      "description": "式8将N×P与N×P²相加但图示有线性残差；损失步索引也需重写",
      "location": "p5式8及13–15",
      "question": "可否明确残差投影和逐预测点损失的代码对应？"
    },
    {
      "risk_id": "R03",
      "severity": "重要问题",
      "certainty": "统计解释边界确定",
      "description": "平均ADF p值不是整体平稳性检验，无法证明分支对应的生成机制",
      "location": "附录C表5/6、3.2",
      "question": "可否用预注册的窗口检验及非线性趋势合成对照？"
    },
    {
      "risk_id": "R04",
      "severity": "重要问题",
      "certainty": "有三种子平均但缺离散度",
      "description": "细小改善未配对检验，混合基线来源仍缺逐格配置",
      "location": "附录K表13–15",
      "question": "能否提供种子结果、验证选参规则、完整测试样本数和配置清单？"
    }
  ],
  "rubric_version": "PAPER-RUBRIC-1.0",
  "reviewer_id": "A",
  "paper_title": "xPatch: Dual-Stream Time Series Forecasting with Exponential Seasonal-Trend Decomposition",
  "paper_version": "2412.17323v3",
  "first_public_date": "2024/12/23",
  "version_date": "2025/02/11",
  "assessment_date": "2026-11-08",
  "analysis_mode": "standard",
  "independence": {
    "other_new_reviews_read": false,
    "legacy_read_before_fulltext": true,
    "legacy_full_reviews_available": false,
    "legacy_records": [
      {
        "source_record_id": "S5-100",
        "source_id": "S5",
        "source_library_file_id": "libfile_849759d66a808191813dbe9bd1605bb4",
        "source_filename": "已粘贴的文本(5).txt",
        "source_line": 34,
        "source_number": 100,
        "title": "xPatch: Dual-Stream Time Series Forecasting with Exponential Seasonal-Trend Decomposition",
        "source_url": "https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/34270",
        "raw_line": "| 18 | [P100 xPatch: Dual-Stream Time Series Forecasting with Exponential Seasonal-Trend Decomposition](https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/34270) | 57.2 | 100% | 70% | 47.5–68.2 | 76 | AAAI 2025 会议论文；附录使用 arXiv:2412.17323v3 | **重要问题**：会议论文称实验实现来自官方代码；当前 README 说采用其他方法发表的结果以避免重新实验。两项表述存在来源边界待澄清，尚未证明同一表格存在直接冲突。；<br>**重要问题**：附录 C 将分块 ADF 检验平均 p 值及阈值用于成分平稳性判断；平均 p 值本身并非经校准的整体检验，拒绝单位根也不足以单独确立一般平稳性。；<br>**重要问题**：主结果平均预测长度；已读主文和附录未定位种子重复与波动报告，小幅差异的稳定性缺少直接支持。 | [评审](论文/P100/评审.md) · [评分数据](论文/P100/评审.json) · 无单独复核文件 |",
        "raw_cells": [
          "18",
          "[P100 xPatch: Dual-Stream Time Series Forecasting with Exponential Seasonal-Trend Decomposition](https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/34270)",
          "57.2",
          "100%",
          "70%",
          "47.5–68.2",
          "76",
          "AAAI 2025 会议论文；附录使用 arXiv:2412.17323v3",
          "**重要问题**：会议论文称实验实现来自官方代码；当前 README 说采用其他方法发表的结果以避免重新实验。两项表述存在来源边界待澄清，尚未证明同一表格存在直接冲突。；<br>**重要问题**：附录 C 将分块 ADF 检验平均 p 值及阈值用于成分平稳性判断；平均 p 值本身并非经校准的整体检验，拒绝单位根也不足以单独确立一般平稳性。；<br>**重要问题**：主结果平均预测长度；已读主文和附录未定位种子重复与波动报告，小幅差异的稳定性缺少直接支持。",
          "[评审](论文/P100/评审.md) · [评分数据](论文/P100/评审.json) · 无单独复核文件"
        ],
        "normalized_title": "xpatchdualstreamtimeseriesforecastingwithexponentialseasonaltrenddecomposition",
        "normalized_url": "ojs.aaai.org/index.php/aaai/article/view/34270",
        "record_type": "legacy_scored",
        "legacy_rank": 18,
        "legacy_score": "57.2",
        "legacy_coverage": "100%",
        "legacy_tentative_share": "70%",
        "legacy_range": "47.5–68.2",
        "citation_verbatim": "76",
        "legacy_review_version": "AAAI 2025 会议论文；附录使用 arXiv:2412.17323v3",
        "legacy_risks_verbatim": "**重要问题**：会议论文称实验实现来自官方代码；当前 README 说采用其他方法发表的结果以避免重新实验。两项表述存在来源边界待澄清，尚未证明同一表格存在直接冲突。；<br>**重要问题**：附录 C 将分块 ADF 检验平均 p 值及阈值用于成分平稳性判断；平均 p 值本身并非经校准的整体检验，拒绝单位根也不足以单独确立一般平稳性。；<br>**重要问题**：主结果平均预测长度；已读主文和附录未定位种子重复与波动报告，小幅差异的稳定性缺少直接支持。",
        "legacy_material_links_verbatim": "[评审](论文/P100/评审.md) · [评分数据](论文/P100/评审.json) · 无单独复核文件",
        "counts_as_independent_review": false
      }
    ],
    "legacy_counts_as_review": false
  },
  "identity": {
    "candidate_id": "ATT-0100",
    "title": "xPatch: Dual-Stream Time Series Forecasting with Exponential Seasonal-Trend Decomposition",
    "authors": [
      "Stitsyuk, Artyom",
      "Choi, Jaesik"
    ],
    "arxiv_id": "2412.17323",
    "arxiv_version": "v3",
    "first_arxiv_date": "2024/12/23",
    "latest_arxiv_date": "2025/02/11",
    "source_urls": [
      "https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/34270"
    ],
    "publication_status": "AAAI 2025, DOI 10.1609/aaai.v39i19.34270 verified",
    "full_text_path": "/workspace/scratch/ac01e91af073/candidate_recovery/priority_packet_20261108/papers/ATT-0100/ATT-0100_paper.pdf",
    "metadata_source_path": "/workspace/scratch/ac01e91af073/candidate_recovery/priority_packet_20261108/papers/ATT-0100/ATT-0100_arxiv.html",
    "full_text_sha256": "032d723a6df6df4d66df52ada8ce695594a21b49493374439f0890fc030c1765",
    "review_state": "ready_for_five_new_independent_reviews",
    "completed_new_reviews": 0,
    "source_versions_not_asserted_identical": true
  },
  "user_context": {
    "research_question": null,
    "prior_knowledge": null,
    "constraints": null
  },
  "aggregation": {
    "weights": null,
    "weighted_score_observed": null,
    "weighted_coverage": null,
    "tentative_weight_share": null,
    "notes": "保留24维原始评分，不预设总分；F组个人背景未知。"
  },
  "scores": [
    {
      "dimension_id": "A1",
      "dimension_name": "问题重要性",
      "score": 80,
      "status": "rated",
      "confidence": "高",
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "轻量长序列预测的成本与精度问题重要",
      "missing_information": null,
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "引言、表3"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "A2",
      "dimension_name": "原创性",
      "score": 60,
      "status": "tentative",
      "confidence": "中",
      "judgment_range": [
        50,
        70
      ],
      "rationale": "EMA、双流、卷积和训练调度均有近邻，贡献主要为组合",
      "missing_information": "见理由及风险记录",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "3.1–3.4"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "A3",
      "dimension_name": "实质推进程度",
      "score": 75,
      "status": "tentative",
      "confidence": "中",
      "judgment_range": [
        65,
        80
      ],
      "rationale": "多协议多领域收益较广，但MSE弱项明确",
      "missing_information": "见理由及风险记录",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "表13–15"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "A4",
      "dimension_name": "知识与解释增量",
      "score": 55,
      "status": "rated",
      "confidence": "高",
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "有实用消融，平稳性和分支理论解释不足",
      "missing_information": null,
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "附录C/D/F"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "B1",
      "dimension_name": "问题定义与评价有效性",
      "score": 80,
      "status": "rated",
      "confidence": "高",
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "统一、搜索与不丢尾批三协议增强有效性",
      "missing_information": null,
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "表1/2/15"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "B2",
      "dimension_name": "技术与论证正确性",
      "score": 45,
      "status": "rated",
      "confidence": "高",
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "常数复杂度结论不成立，公式维度和机制命题有缺口",
      "missing_information": null,
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "式8、附录C/D"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "B3",
      "dimension_name": "数据与评测流程完整性",
      "score": 70,
      "status": "tentative",
      "confidence": "中",
      "judgment_range": [
        60,
        80
      ],
      "rationale": "给数据划分与TFB协议，逐格流水线未核验",
      "missing_information": "见理由及风险记录",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "附录A/K"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "B4",
      "dimension_name": "比较对象与比较公平性",
      "score": 70,
      "status": "rated",
      "confidence": "高",
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "基线充分且来源区分，但混合来源、预算与选参规则仍需明细",
      "missing_information": null,
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "附录K"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "C1",
      "dimension_name": "核心主张的证据充分度",
      "score": 75,
      "status": "rated",
      "confidence": "高",
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "大规模结果支撑条件性性能，不支撑普遍最优和常数复杂度",
      "missing_information": null,
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "表13–15、附录D"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "C2",
      "dimension_name": "机制归因与竞争解释区分度",
      "score": 70,
      "status": "rated",
      "confidence": "高",
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "多项消融较好，MAE与权重、有效学习率预算混杂",
      "missing_information": null,
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "附录E–J"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "C3",
      "dimension_name": "结果稳定性与不确定性处理",
      "score": 55,
      "status": "rated",
      "confidence": "高",
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "三种子平均但缺误差棒与配对不确定性",
      "missing_information": null,
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "附录K"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "C4",
      "dimension_name": "适用范围与边界验证",
      "score": 75,
      "status": "rated",
      "confidence": "高",
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "多个领域跨度、协议与输入长度覆盖，缺预测失败机制分析",
      "missing_information": null,
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "表13–15、图10"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "D1",
      "dimension_name": "过程透明度",
      "score": 65,
      "status": "rated",
      "confidence": "高",
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "附录详尽但公式和逐项运行来源不够闭合",
      "missing_information": null,
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "方法、附录K"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "D2",
      "dimension_name": "研究资源可获得性",
      "score": 70,
      "status": "tentative",
      "confidence": "中",
      "judgment_range": [
        55,
        85
      ],
      "rationale": "代码链接明确，版本可运行性未核验",
      "missing_information": "见理由及风险记录",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "p1代码链接"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "D3",
      "dimension_name": "主张克制与报告一致性",
      "score": 60,
      "status": "rated",
      "confidence": "高",
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "一般性机制、复杂度与动态加权措辞超出证据",
      "missing_information": null,
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "3.2、附录C/D"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "D4",
      "dimension_name": "表达清晰度",
      "score": 75,
      "status": "rated",
      "confidence": "高",
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "结构图和完整实验清楚，索引和统计表述需修订",
      "missing_information": null,
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "图3、附录"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "E1",
      "dimension_name": "复杂度合理性",
      "score": 80,
      "status": "rated",
      "confidence": "高",
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "模块规模可控且多项消融表明实用价值",
      "missing_information": null,
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "图3、表3、附录E–J"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "E2",
      "dimension_name": "资源效率与成本收益",
      "score": 70,
      "status": "tentative",
      "confidence": "中",
      "judgment_range": [
        60,
        80
      ],
      "rationale": "实测快于若干强基线但慢于DLinear，缺完整成本曲线",
      "missing_information": "见理由及风险记录",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "表3"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "E3",
      "dimension_name": "可迁移与可复用程度",
      "score": 80,
      "status": "tentative",
      "confidence": "中",
      "judgment_range": [
        70,
        85
      ],
      "rationale": "EMA、损失和调度可单独迁移，残差实现应先澄清",
      "missing_information": "见理由及风险记录",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "表7/9/11"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "E4",
      "dimension_name": "后续研究启发性",
      "score": 75,
      "status": "rated",
      "confidence": "高",
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "训练目标、分解与架构联合审计有后续价值",
      "missing_information": null,
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [
        "附录E–K"
      ],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "F1",
      "dimension_name": "与当前问题的相关性",
      "score": null,
      "status": "unknown",
      "confidence": null,
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "用户个人研究问题、先验知识、计算资源和当前决策条件未提供。",
      "missing_information": "用户个人研究问题、先验知识、计算资源和当前决策条件未提供。",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "F2",
      "dimension_name": "相对于已有知识的学习收益",
      "score": null,
      "status": "unknown",
      "confidence": null,
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "用户个人研究问题、先验知识、计算资源和当前决策条件未提供。",
      "missing_information": "用户个人研究问题、先验知识、计算资源和当前决策条件未提供。",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "F3",
      "dimension_name": "当前使用可行性",
      "score": null,
      "status": "unknown",
      "confidence": null,
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "用户个人研究问题、先验知识、计算资源和当前决策条件未提供。",
      "missing_information": "用户个人研究问题、先验知识、计算资源和当前决策条件未提供。",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [],
      "claim_ids": []
    },
    {
      "dimension_id": "F4",
      "dimension_name": "当前决策信息价值",
      "score": null,
      "status": "unknown",
      "confidence": null,
      "judgment_range": null,
      "rationale": "用户个人研究问题、先验知识、计算资源和当前决策条件未提供。",
      "missing_information": "用户个人研究问题、先验知识、计算资源和当前决策条件未提供。",
      "source_ids": [
        "S01"
      ],
      "evidence_locations": [],
      "claim_ids": []
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "source_id": "S01",
      "source_type": "原论文全文及附录",
      "location": "/workspace/scratch/ac01e91af073/candidate_recovery/priority_packet_20261108/papers/ATT-0100/ATT-0100_paper.pdf",
      "version_or_date": "2412.17323v3",
      "sha256": "032d723a6df6df4d66df52ada8ce695594a21b49493374439f0890fc030c1765",
      "access_status": "全文可读；未运行代码或模型"
    },
    {
      "source_id": "S02",
      "source_type": "历史摘要，非完整旧评",
      "location": "/workspace/scratch/ac01e91af073/candidate_recovery/priority_packet_20261108/papers/ATT-0100/legacy_reference_only.json",
      "access_status": "先读；仅历史待核线索，不作新评票"
    }
  ],
  "review_chinese_char_count": 1761
}